This Week In Religion and Politics

Transcript 30 lines

Cold Open Stats Overview Paper Walkthrough free_promo

Cold Open

Davis Have you ever changed what you believe because of the people you were arguing with?

Jenny Maybe, but I get nervous when we turn every faith story into a politics story, because sometimes people change after a death, a church fight, or just getting older.

Davis Totally, but sometimes politics is the road sign, not the destination; it points someone back toward a question they thought they were done asking.

Jenny So the question is whether politics is actually changing the belief, or just giving people new words for a shift that was already happening.

Davis And one interview study this week says progressive religious people described three routes: politics pushed some away, pulled some back, and helped some name what kind of believer they could still be...welcome to This Week In Religion and Politics on paperboy.fm.

Stats Overview

Davis Quick map of the week: we analyzed 885 hits, shortlisted 200, and ended with 73 qualified papers from 106 authors across 34 countries. So the feed is busy, but not globally even; India leads with 6 papers, then the U.S. with 5.

Jenny And the jump is real. Qualified papers went from 48 last episode to 73, up 52.1%. My skeptic question is why now, because the stats tell us volume, not cause; the top tags point toward religion, peacebuilding, social cohesion, and Nigeria.

Davis The bigger pile is even starker upstream: query hits went from 564 to 885, up 56.9%, while unique countries fell from 89 to 34. That sounds like more papers clustered in fewer places, with Russia, Nigeria, and Britain each at 4.

Jenny Method mix helps explain the texture. Qualitative work dominates with 35 papers; that means interviews, textual reading, or field-based interpretation more than counting outcomes. Then it's historical analysis at 9, surveys at 8, case studies at 6, and only 2 experiments.

Davis That matters for the through-line. If the week is mostly qualitative and historical, religion shows up less like a fixed voting bloc and more like relationships, symbols, and local authorities; Buddhism, nationalism, Islam, and peacebuilding are all doing different work depending on setting.

Jenny Author mix is pretty balanced too: 22 first-time authors, meaning first-ever paper in the metadata, 41 emerging researchers, and 43 experienced researchers out of 106. So this isn't just senior names setting the frame; there's a lot of newer voices in the evidence base.

Paper Walkthrough

Paper 1 “It Started to Dawn on Me That It's Hard for Me to Love My Neighbor if I'm Shooting Him From 200 Yards Away”: Three Pathways for How Politics Shapes Religion

Davis Alright, let's get into the papers with a reversal. Todd Nicholas Fuist and Elizabeth Johnson have a 2026 Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion piece called “It Started to Dawn on Me That It's Hard for Me to Love My Neighbor if I'm Shooting Him From 200 Yards Away,” and it's asking how politics can reshape religion, not the other way around.

Davis The plain finding is that, for some progressive religious people, politics wasn't just an add-on to faith. It was the doorway back into faith, the reason they rebuilt faith, or the thing that made faith possible in the first place.

Davis The authors name three pathways. Returning means someone was raised religious, drifted away, and came back through political commitments; reorienting means someone stayed religious but changed the content of their faith to fit their politics; and becoming means someone who wasn't religious found religion through politics.

Jenny How do they know politics is shaping religion here, and not just people retelling their faith story in political language because that language is available now?

Davis That's the key check. They draw on two qualitative research projects, meaning close reading of people's own narratives rather than a survey with a national sample, and they focus on progressive religious individuals who explicitly say their current faith identity grew out of political experience.

Davis So the evidence is rich, but it isn't a population estimate. It's more like a map of three possible routes, and the big limit is that remembered life stories can show meaning and sequence, but they can't prove how common the pattern is.

Jenny That feels like the right scale for the claim. If you're a minister, organizer, or teacher, the takeaway isn't that politics replaces religion; it's that political experience can be part of spiritual formation, which fits this week's Politics Remakes Faith thread pretty cleanly.

Paper 2 How Pro-contact Norms and Intergroup Anxiety Predict Interest in Intergroup Contact: Similarity and Variability across Outgroups

Jenny That last paper was a map from remembered stories, not a population estimate; this one flips the tradeoff with two representative U.S. surveys. Mathias Kauff, Calista Small, D. Yudkin, Jordan Wylie, and Linda Tropp call it How Pro-contact Norms and Intergroup Anxiety Predict Interest in Intergroup Contact.

Jenny The plain finding is practical: people say they're more willing to meet across group lines when they think their community approves of that contact, and when the first encounter feels less scary. The study covers five thousand five hundred twenty-two people, and it looks across four kinds of outgroups, meaning people seen as outside your own group: ethno-racial, religious, political, and socioeconomic.

Davis So if a community wants more cross-group contact, what changes first: the norms, the anxiety, or the actual opportunities to meet?

Jenny The authors can't fully rank those three, because this is survey evidence about interest, not a field test where they changed one thing at a time. But they do show that perceived pro-contact norms, meaning the sense that people around you support meeting across lines, and intergroup anxiety, meaning nervousness about the encounter, both predict interest even after accounting for prior contact and individual traits.

Jenny The big limit is that interest isn't follow-through. Someone can tell a survey they'd meet a religious, political, racial, or class outgroup member and still avoid the actual dinner, classroom project, or neighborhood meeting when it appears.

Davis That still gives organizers a usable checklist. In this Belonging Under Pressure thread, the move isn't just to create a mixed room; it's to make support for the room visible and lower the fear of walking into it.

Paper 3 Religious authority and political solutions to conflict: experimental evidence from religious leaders in Israel

Davis That checklist idea carries over, but this paper makes it harder: Religious authority and political solutions to conflict asks whether a respected religious leader can make compromise feel acceptable in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, not just make a mixed room less scary.

Davis Freedman and Pazit Ben-Nun Bloom run two survey experiments in Israel, and the plain finding is sober: religious leaders don't move everyone toward peace. The modest bump shows up mainly among religious respondents when the leader has both religious authority and political credibility, meaning people see them as spiritually legitimate and also believable on public affairs.

Jenny So what exactly counted as influence here? Were respondents changing their minds about actual compromise, or were already-religious people just taking a cue from someone they were already inclined to trust?

Davis They varied the leader's authority and credibility inside survey vignettes, then measured support for compromise over a conflict involving sacred values, meaning claims people treat as morally non-negotiable. The important limit is right there: this is one conflict setting, with effects concentrated among religious respondents, so it's evidence of constrained persuasion, not a universal law that clerics can unlock peace.

Jenny That feels like the Religious Authority Tested thread in miniature. A religious endorsement can matter, but it's not a magic key; peacebuilders still have to match the messenger, the audience, and the issue, or they're just putting a holy stamp on a door nobody plans to open.

This Week In Religion and Politics

When Politics Rewrites Faith

Episode

Cold Open

Stats Overview

Paper Walkthrough

Paper 1 “It Started to Dawn on Me That It's Hard for Me to Love My Neighbor if I'm Shooting Him From 200 Yards Away”: Three Pathways for How Politics Shapes Religion

Paper 2 How Pro-contact Norms and Intergroup Anxiety Predict Interest in Intergroup Contact: Similarity and Variability across Outgroups

Paper 3 Religious authority and political solutions to conflict: experimental evidence from religious leaders in Israel

free_promo

Other Episodes

This Week In Religion and Politics

When Politics Rewrites Faith

Episode

Cold Open

Stats Overview

Paper Walkthrough

Paper 1 “It Started to Dawn on Me That It's Hard for Me to Love My Neighbor if I'm Shooting Him From 200 Yards Away”: Three Pathways for How Politics Shapes Religion

Paper 2 How Pro-contact Norms and Intergroup Anxiety Predict Interest in Intergroup Contact: Similarity and Variability across Outgroups

Paper 3 Religious authority and political solutions to conflict: experimental evidence from religious leaders in Israel

free_promo

Other Episodes

Get This Week In Religion and Politics by email