This Week In Religion and Politics

Transcript 28 lines

Cold Open Stats Overview Paper Walkthrough free_promo

Cold Open

Jenny Have you ever felt sure about something just because the explanation sounded really clean?

Davis Absolutely, and I hate that it works on me, because a clean summary can feel like someone cleared the fog even when they maybe just moved the furniture.

Jenny I like the clean version too, but I want the receipt, because sounding understandable isn't the same as someone actually understanding what they now think they know.

Davis That's the thread this week, right, belief and identity showing up not as private feelings but as systems people use to vote, draw borders, moderate platforms, argue in court, teach kids, and repair daily life.

Jenny And the part I can't shake is how fast fluent answers can make people feel theologically certain before they become theologically competent, so...welcome to This Week In Religion and Politics on paperboy.fm.

Stats Overview

Jenny This week we screened six hundred eighty-three hits and kept fifty-nine papers, with one hundred six unique authors across thirty-one countries.

Davis So the qualified pile rose from fifty-four to fifty-nine, about a nine percent bump, even while total hits fell from eight hundred ninety-seven to six hundred eighty-three. That makes me wonder whether the search got less noisy, or whether religion-and-politics work clustered more tightly around this week's themes.

Jenny The authorship base also widened a little: one hundred six authors, up from ninety-nine, and countries moved from thirty to thirty-one. That's not a huge geographic jump, but Indonesia shows up ten times and the United States six, so the map is broad and still uneven.

Davis Method matters here: thirty-three of the fifty-nine qualified papers are qualitative, meaning they build claims from interviews, texts, fieldwork, or close cases rather than big-number modeling. That fits a week where religion is showing up as lived infrastructure, in borders, courts, classrooms, peacebuilding, and online conflict.

Jenny The author mix is unusually balanced too: thirty-two first-time authors, meaning first-ever paper in the metadata, thirty-eight emerging authors, and thirty-six experienced authors. That's roughly thirty percent, thirty-six percent, and thirty-four percent, so this isn't just senior scholars steering the conversation.

Davis Theme-wise, the quick sweep is religion at five papers, social justice and nationalism at four each, and peacebuilding at three. Put together, the stats point to the through-line: belief isn't staying private this week; it's becoming election machinery, border language, platform conflict, and repair work.

Paper Walkthrough

Paper 1 “True Americans” at the ballot box: ascriptive republicanism, Christian nationalism, and the populist right in 2024

Jenny Alright, let's get into the papers with Alexandra Filindra and colleagues, in Frontiers in Political Science, and their study called “True Americans” at the ballot box. They’re asking why Trump gained ground in twenty twenty-four with non-White, working-class, and Catholic voters, when the usual Christian nationalism story doesn’t fully explain that shift.

Jenny Their surprise is that ascriptive martial republicanism predicts Trump favorability better than Christian nationalism across most groups. That means a picture of the “real American” tied to whiteness, being native-born, Christianity, traditional gender roles, and a protector or fighter ethic, rather than just the belief that America should be formally Christian.

Davis If Christian nationalism wasn’t the strongest explanation, what exactly was this AMR measure capturing that could pull in voters who aren’t white evangelical Republicans?

Jenny They used a weighted daily cross-sectional survey from May through December twenty twenty-four, with seventeen thousand four hundred three respondents, so it’s a new snapshot each day adjusted to better match the electorate. They tested AMR and Christian nationalism against favorability toward Trump, Biden, and Harris, plus vote choice, and AMR outperformed Christian nationalism on Trump favorability across most subgroups while doing at least as well on vote choice. The big limit is that this is strong evidence for one U.S. election cycle, not a universal theory of populism everywhere.

Davis That makes the practical takeaway pretty sharp: if you’re trying to understand the populist right, don’t only ask whether voters want a Christian nation. Ask what kind of nation they think needs defending, who they think belongs inside it, and how that belief moves politics at the ballot box.

Paper 2 a5a1e66fcf641cd23c81a2c85d9fe5e004b99e2c2

Davis That line about who belongs inside the nation is a clean bridge, because this paper shifts from twenty twenty-four campaign measurement to Indonesia’s founding arguments. It’s called The Ideological Dialectic Between Islam and the State in Indonesia’s State Principles, and it asks how Islam entered state life without becoming a formal state religion.

Davis The core claim is compromise: Islam became public through Pancasila, the five state principles, as shared ethics rather than a winner-take-all constitutional command. The paper follows BPUPKI and PPKI, the independence-era drafting bodies, the Jakarta Charter, an early draft whose Islamic-law clause became a flashpoint, and Constituent Assembly debates to propose an Indonesian Ideological Mediation model, meaning religious ideals get translated into common civic language.

Jenny How do we know this is more than a tidy reading of constitutional history, especially when documents can make conflict look cleaner than it felt?

Davis The evidence is primary-source reconstruction, not polling: the author reads founding committee discussions, the Jakarta Charter fight over Islamic-law language, and the Constituent Assembly’s failed effort in the nineteen fifties to settle the state’s ideological basis. That makes the support historical and documentary, so it traces how elite ideas were argued and institutionalized more than what ordinary Indonesians think now.

Jenny That’s useful, because it complicates the Identity Becomes Governance thread from the last paper. In the U.S. case, identity content predicted ballot behavior; here, religious identity becomes governance only after being filtered through public ethics, and that filter may be exactly what keeps a plural democracy from turning every constitutional sentence into a boundary fight.

Paper 3 Political Perspectives and Religiosity Contribute to Homonegative Attitudes Among Sicilian Psychologists.

Jenny That phrase from Indonesia, public ethics, is a useful bridge, because this next paper asks what happens when private belief shows up inside a professional ethics setting: E. J. Vargo’s Political Perspectives and Religiosity Contribute to Homonegative Attitudes Among Sicilian Psychologists.

Jenny The plain finding is worrying: in a survey of seven hundred twenty-seven licensed psychologists in Sicily, about eight percent of the region’s registered psychologists in twenty twenty-one, religion and right-wing politics were linked with more negative views of LGBT+ people. Homonegative attitudes just means beliefs or assumptions that treat homosexuality as wrong, disordered, or something to be fixed.

Jenny The number that jumps off the page is twenty-seven percent: more than one in four participants partially or completely agreed that a professional should help a client change sexual orientation, even though the Italian Psychologists Association bans conversion practices.

Davis So what would actually change that: more training, clearer rules, or something deeper in the political and religious worldview?

Jenny The study can’t fully answer that, because it’s a regional self-report survey, not an experiment or a map of all psychologists. But Vargo used a survey already administered in other Italian regions, then ran descriptive and exploratory analyses, meaning the paper is looking for patterns in reported attitudes rather than proving what caused them.

Davis The practical takeaway is pretty concrete: licensing bodies and training programs can’t just say “be ethical” and move on. If more than a quarter of a sizable regional sample accepts orientation-change work in some form, sexual diversity education has to be repeated, specific, and tied directly to what a clinician is allowed to do with a real client in the room.

This Week In Religion and Politics

Religion Meets the Machinery of State

Episode

Cold Open

Stats Overview

Paper Walkthrough

Paper 1 “True Americans” at the ballot box: ascriptive republicanism, Christian nationalism, and the populist right in 2024

Paper 2 a5a1e66fcf641cd23c81a2c85d9fe5e004b99e2c2

Paper 3 Political Perspectives and Religiosity Contribute to Homonegative Attitudes Among Sicilian Psychologists.

free_promo

Other Episodes

This Week In Religion and Politics

Religion Meets the Machinery of State

Episode

Cold Open

Stats Overview

Paper Walkthrough

Paper 1 “True Americans” at the ballot box: ascriptive republicanism, Christian nationalism, and the populist right in 2024

Paper 2 a5a1e66fcf641cd23c81a2c85d9fe5e004b99e2c2

Paper 3 Political Perspectives and Religiosity Contribute to Homonegative Attitudes Among Sicilian Psychologists.

free_promo

Other Episodes

Get This Week In Religion and Politics by email