What's Well & Good in Spirituality

What's Well & Good in Spirituality

Papers relating to Spirituality and Wellbeing.

Spirituality and wellbeing beyond the private sphere

This week’s work treats spirituality, spiritual health, and related wellbeing practices as relevant to clinics, campuses, public health, ecology, and screens. Several papers ask what changes when wellbeing is understood as embodied, relational, holistic, or place-based.

  • Indigenous and local-theology models frame wellbeing and ethics in holistic, ecological, and place-based terms, not merely individual or clinical ones.
  • Cancer, infertility, and university counseling papers place spirituality or spiritual health alongside psychosocial support, mental health, and quality-of-life concerns.
  • Digital spirituality and vaccine-decision studies examine how belief systems interact with platforms and health institutions.
Wellbeing as relationship
A systematic scoping review for decolonial public and global health: Indigenous frameworks and models of wellbeing from Turtle Island and Moananuiākea
It matters because it maps Indigenous-developed wellbeing frameworks from Turtle Island and Moananuiākea, challenging public health models that individualize wellbeing.
The Worship of Shiva in the Context of Local Theology: The Integration of Spirituality and Ecology in Gobleg Village, Bali
It matters because the Bali ethnography links Shiva worship, local wisdom, sacred space, and ecological ethics amid environmental crisis.
Spirituality in health and student services
A practical theology case for integrating pastoral counselling into student counselling services at South African universities
It matters because it argues South African student counselling should include pastoral counselling for spiritual needs that are often neglected.
The interplay of social support and spirituality in active cancer treatment: A mediation model of quality of life.
It matters because it tests whether spirituality helps explain the link between perceived social support and quality of life during active cancer treatment.
Association of spiritual health with mental health status, and quality of life among women with infertility: A systematic review
It matters because it systematically reviews how spiritual health relates to mental health and quality of life among women with infertility.
Everyday practices, platforms, and health decisions
From Screens to Souls: The Possibilities and Limits of Digital Spirituality
It matters because it weighs the accessibility of prayer apps, online communities, and digital retreats against risks of algorithmic mediation.
Evaluation of Spiritual Well-Being, Vaccine Hesitancy, and Vaccine Advocacy Among Parents of Children Aged 0–2 Years
It matters because it examines spiritual well-being alongside vaccine hesitancy and vaccine advocacy among parents of children aged 0–2 years.
Nourish to Flourish: A mindful eating intervention for older adults improves dietary awareness and well-being.
It matters because it evaluates a community mindful-eating program for older adults aimed at dietary awareness and wellness.
Summary written from this week's papers and fact-checked against their abstracts.

Episode

Transcript 27 lines

Cold Open

Davis When life gets heavy, what helps more: a calming habit, or knowing you are not facing it alone?
Jenny I want to say both, but I'm going to defend the calming habit for a second, because breathing, prayer, a walk, a small ritual can keep the floor from dropping out.
Davis Totally, and then my question is who gets the quiet room, the safe walk, the elder, the ocean, the clinic chaplain, or just another app telling them to cope harder?
Jenny Right, because if the tool only works when someone already has safety and time and people nearby, then we're not just studying inner peace, we're studying access.
Davis And that's where this week's papers got interesting to me: wellbeing keeps showing up as relationship, from Indigenous care and housing to blue space to cancer support...welcome to What's Well & Good in Spirituality on paperboy.fm.

Stats Overview

Jenny This week is bigger. We screened 192 search hits, found 55 qualified papers, and they came from 208 unique authors across 18 countries. So the feed is busier, but not more geographically spread out.
Davis Right, because qualified papers rose from 39 to 55, up 41 percent from last episode. The driver we can actually see is method: 28 of the 55 are qualitative, meaning interviews, observations, or close readings rather than mostly statistics. That fits this week’s through-line, where spirituality shows up as care, place, culture, and practice.
Jenny The search pool grew too: 145 hits last time, 192 now, up about 32 percent. Unique authors rose faster, from 147 to 208, up about 42 percent. But countries fell from 21 to 18, so I’d ask whether this is more collaboration inside fewer country clusters, not a truly wider map.
Davis The author mix is unusually open. Of 208 authors, 79 are first-time, meaning first-ever paper in the metadata, 67 are emerging, and 62 are experienced. That’s 38 percent first-time, 32 percent emerging, and 30 percent established, which makes the week feel less like one settled field and more like several communities bringing evidence in.
Jenny Theme-wise, the quick sweep is spirituality at 7 papers, mental health at 4, then public health and Islamic education at 3 each. That’s the infrastructure story again: not just private belief, but clinics, schools, community programs, and everyday systems people lean on.
Davis And the limitation is baked into the shape of the evidence. With 28 qualitative papers and only 5 surveys, 3 systematic reviews, and 3 cross-sectional studies, this week is strong on lived texture and weaker on broad measurement. Useful, but I wouldn’t turn it into a universal claim yet.

Paper Walkthrough

Paper 1 A systematic scoping review for decolonial public and global health: Indigenous frameworks and models of wellbeing from Turtle Island and Moananuiākea

Davis Alright, let’s get into the papers with the widest frame first: A scoping review of Indigenous wellbeing frameworks from Turtle Island and Moananuiākea. Joanne Qina‘au and colleagues published this in Frontiers in Public Health in twenty twenty-six, and they’re asking what public health misses when wellbeing gets treated as an individual checklist instead of a web of land, ancestors, language, culture, and community.
Davis They screened one thousand four hundred seventy-three database references, added eighty-nine more from hand searches and grey literature, meaning reports and other sources outside standard journals, then ended with thirty-three manuscripts after sixty-one full-text reviews. Twenty-one came from Moananuiākea, the Pacific region, and twelve came from Turtle Island, meaning North America, and the shared pattern was relational wellbeing: health is held between people, place, spirit, and responsibility.
Jenny How did they decide which frameworks actually counted as Indigenous-developed wellbeing models, and not just outside researchers using Indigenous language around a standard health scale?
Davis They used PRISMA-ScR, which is a checklist for doing a scoping review, or a structured map of a research field rather than a test of one treatment. To be included, a paper had to present an original model, framework, or theory of wellbeing, be developed for Indigenous people, families, or communities, and be authored by Indigenous scholars from those lands; the big limitation is that this is a synthesis from specific regions, not proof that any one model improves health outcomes.
Jenny That’s a strong map, not a clinical trial, and I like that distinction because the practical message is still sharp. If a public health team treats land, ancestors, language, and collective care as optional context, this paper says they’re not adding culture later; they’re leaving out part of health itself.

Paper 2 Racial and economic disparities in coastal access and engagement mediate the ocean’s contribution to human wellbeing

Jenny That line about land not being optional context carries straight into this next paper, because now the place is the coast. Timothy Frawley and colleagues have a Nature Communications study called Racial and economic disparities in coastal access and engagement mediate the ocean’s contribution to human wellbeing.
Jenny The plain finding is that the ocean helped people most through connection, relationships, and mental health, not mainly through money, food, or other material benefits. They analyzed one thousand six hundred ninety-one surveys from central California, and the authors say those relational and subjective benefits were bigger than material contributions.
Davis Were they measuring actual ocean access, perceived benefits, or both, because those can tell very different stories for a family that lives ten miles from the beach but can’t afford parking or doesn’t know where it’s safe to swim?
Jenny Both, basically. They used community-engaged research, meaning local communities helped shape the work rather than just being studied, and the survey asked about ocean use, benefits, and barriers like affordability, weak infrastructure, pollution exposure, and knowledge about safe and legal engagement; the limitation is that central California gives them a strong regional picture, not a universal map of every coastline.
Davis So the practical takeaway is not just protect the ocean and hope wellbeing follows. If relational wellbeing depends on getting there, feeling safe there, and knowing how to belong there, then coastal governance has to include access, affordability, safety, and community knowledge as part of public health.

Paper 3 Association of spiritual health with mental health status, and quality of life among women with infertility: A systematic review

Davis That word access carries over, just in a clinic instead of a coastline. This paper is called Association of spiritual health with mental health status, and quality of life among women with infertility: A systematic review, and it's asking whether spiritual resources show up alongside better mental health during infertility care.
Davis The plain version is pretty careful. Across ten studies with one thousand eight hundred fifty-two women with infertility, higher spiritual health, meaning a person's sense of meaning, connection, and support through faith or spiritual practice, was linked with lower stress, anxiety, and depression.
Jenny If all ten included studies were cross-sectional, so basically one-time snapshots, what would actually change your mind about causality here?
Davis A trial or a long follow-up would change my mind, because this review can't tell whether spiritual health lowers distress, or whether less distress makes spiritual life easier to access. The authors searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar in Farsi and English, found two hundred seventy-five articles, included ten, and most scored below five on a seven-point quality scale, so the lower-distress link is consistent but the evidence base is small and generally weak.
Jenny That feels like the right lane for spiritual care systems. Ask patients what spiritual resources they already use, make room for chaplaincy or community support if they want it, but don't tell a woman in infertility treatment that spirituality alone is going to fix her quality of life, especially when the review says that part was contradictory.

free_promo

Paperboy.fm This is the free version of the podcast. Subscribe at paperboy.fm to access a dozen different paper review podcasts for five dollars a month.

Other Episodes